Decrease text size
Increase text size

We are just two steps away from a better world:
step 1: Stop the creation of fake money by private banks...
step 2: Replace our fake democracy by true democracy...


The secrets behind money:

If you just sign here, I will give you a balance of $ 1,000 and you will owe me $ 1,000 plus interest.

The banking system in short

Private banks or a bank of the government. A comparaison.

With just a tiny little bit of money bankers can pay each other millions...

Secrets of money, interest and inflation

From state debt to state money

Politicians give billions away to private bankers...

A tale of two monetary systems

Towards a sound economy

Bank crisis? Reform!

Debit, credit, banco!

Banking explained:
the Derivative Scam

The secrets behind the euro:

Out of the euro, and then?

ESM, the new European dictator!

YouTube: The dictatorship of the ESM robs the Treasuries in 3'51''

Keep quiet! We build Europe!"

ESM, a coup d'état in 17 countries!

ESM: How the Goldman Vampire Squid Just Captured Europe

Zeus rapes Europa

NATO rescues euro in Libya

Uncover secrets:

Wake up citizens?

The chicken-parliament

Farewell to growth:


World Energy and Population

Energy crisis:
Turning-point of humanity

The secrets behind the war in Iraq:

Cost, abuse and danger of the dollar

Iraq Memorial

The secrets behind the war in Afghanistan:

Pipelines to 9/11

The secrets behind the accusations against Iran:

Raid on Nuclear Fuel Market

Wipe Israel from the map?

Facts and lies about the climate:

1: The clockwork of the Earth and Sun

2: The activity of the Sun

3: CO2: scare, claims and fraud...


There are alternatives to capitalism...

Protest in Draguignan


Do you want to know who publishes the fool's articles?


Treaty establishing the European Union (EU)

Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Amendment article 136 TFEU

First version of the Treaty establishing the European Stability Mechanism (ESM)(not ratified)

Treaty establishing the European Stability Mechanism (ESM)

Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the economic and monetary union (TSCG)

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969

NATO rescues euro in Libya

NATO intervention is to rescue French banks and the euro

by Xander Meyer,
Xander Nieuws
1 September 2011

A Libyan rebel fighter takes pictures of dead soldiers. Some 50,000 Libyans have paid with their lives for the - provisional - rescue of the French banks and the euro.

Over the past few months we have heard so much nonsense about the so-called needed, but in fact scandalous "humanitarian" war of NATO against Libya (in which about 50,000 have perished) that we felt it was necessary to put forward some facts. They show the real reason Gaddafi was ousted had nothing to do with his non existant "blood shedding", and everything to do with rescuing the troubled French banks and the euro. Read how, once again, you have been deceived by the politicians and the media.

It is a fact that in countries like Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates no military intervention has been planned to chase away the dictators who rule there. On the contrary: European countries like Germany offer these regimes professional intelligence and arms. So, why then an intervention in Libya?

In October 2010, Nuri Mesmari, head of Gadaffi's secretariat, was interrogated in Paris by the French secret services. It has been reported in Asian and other media that Mesmari disclosed Libyan state secrets in exchange for a large payment. For president Sarkozy these secrets were a slap in the face, in particular because Gaddafi intended to withdraw all of the Libyan oil billions from Europe. These balances would be withdrawn from mostly French banks and would be transferred to Asia.

Fear for collapsing of French banks

Sarkozy feared this step would have far reaching consequences for the French banks that were already in trouble. He feared they would collapse if the Libyan oil billions were withdrawn. And if the French banks collapsed, France would not be able to participate anymore in the European Rescue Funds. Without France's participation, that program would collapse as well. This chain reaction would endanger the continuation of the euro and the entire euro zone.

What also played a role is the fact that Gaddafi had announced he would not buy the French fighter plane Rafale anymore and in any case he would not grant the construction of a Libyan nuclear plant to the French. The French corporation Total wanted new oil contracts in Libya, but Gaddafi granted them to the Italian company ENI. (Gaddafi and the Italian prime minister Berlusconi are good friends.)

What followed was essentially a repeat of the 1953 coup d'état in Iran. Then it was the CIA who set it up, now it was the French who did the same in Libya. In the respected Asia Times everything has been described in detail. First France assured itself of the support of Saudi Arabia and Bahrain with the promise to leave these regimes alone with their human right violations.Both Arab regimes would arrange the support of the Arab League. "Of course", the US, together with some European nations (among which the Netherlands) also intervened to prevent the collapse of the French banks.

Insurgence of the rebels organized by France

The French philosopher and media sweetheart Bernard Henri-Lévy was flown to Benghazi to become the spokesman of the "rebel movement" that was pieced together by the Western secret services. In the presence of the drummed up media Henri-Lévy phoned from Benghazi with Sarkozy and announced the beginning of the Libyan democratic movement that would oust Gaddafi. Following that, the Libyan bank balances were frozen and the French banks were - temporarily - rescued.

The whole circus looked convincing enough for the Western people. In Libya the existing rivalry between different tribes was exploited to make the media report step by step a false narrative about fictitious conquests of territories. The next phase had been planned in advance too: the support of these rebels by NATO.

The reports that the CIA flew 1,500 fighters from Afghanistan to Libya to support the rebels came from Pakistani governmental circles, whose relation with the CIA had cooled below freezing point. Since the elimination of Osama bin Laden, Pakistan, out of anger, had started to spread all kinds of false rumors about the CIA. One of the rumors was the transfer of hundreds of Persians and Uzbeks to Libya. The numerous journalists in Libya who were constantly accompanying the rebels, haven't met a single Persian or Uzbek there.

Oil deal in exchange for the support of the insurgence

Back to France. Here the Libyan oil billions will, for the main part, stay in hands of the French banks. Of probably over € 10 billions, France wants to free up at maximum € 1.5 billion for the new Libyan government. And, by the way, banks in other EU countries can also feel relieved now. Moreover, in exchange for these billions they can sell lots of goods to Libya. Finally, the new Libyan government will have to show its thankfulness for the "liberation" of their country. The media announced today (1 Sept 2011) that France has indeed made a secret oil deal with the rebels in exchange for the French support of the rebellion against Gaddafi. (3)

We will find out soon enough if Libya decides to buy the French fighter jets, to grant the construction of a nuclear plant to the French and to grant oil concessions to the French Total. Also, the secret services will have to find out how they can supply new work to their new contacts. Gaddafi's Dutch prostitute supplier has already been interrogated by the AIVD, the Dutch Intelligence and Security Service. She supplied the needed prostitutes to the regime and maybe she could do the same for the new people in power.

France distributes the war bounty

So now you know how the "democratic" Libyan rebellion movement came about and who was behind it. Some 50,000 people have paid with their lives to avoid the collapse of French banks and to postpone for some time the collapse of the euro.Today (1 Sept 2011) a "reconstruction" conference takes place in Paris, where over € 34 billion that Libya has in Western banks accounts, will be "distributed". Sarkozy has set himself up as the big reconstruction man of Libya. To put it otherwise: he will keep the bigger part of the bounty in France by means of  billion-euros contracts with the new Libyans in power,

Last Saturday we announced that brigades related to Al Qaeda have become the masters in Tripoli. Yesterday US president Obama has confirmed this. (2). In short: the people against whom the West fights in countries like Afghanistan and Iraq, Al Qaeda, are the same Muslim-extremists who are put into the saddle in Libya by NATO. It is once again proof that Western principles are worth nothing at all as soon as (big) money is involved. The real prostitutes are to be found in the financial and political elite of power.

Middle east in flames and fire?

Meanwhile the big (end) game continues. Sarkozy has already publicly announced that the Islamic Republic Iran may well be the next target. Also the Turk-Saudian preparations for military intervention in Syria are well underway. You will see that the next big war, that may well set the whole Middle East on fire - and maybe even countries outside of it - , will be presented by the media as a "complete surprise", exactly like the Libyan revolution, which was planned, from the start, by France.(1)


(1) KOPP
(3) NU

Translation: Rudo de Ruijter

Copyright: FREE


Should more people read this article?

On the internet the readers have the power! They decide which information goes around the globe! You may not be aware of it, but if each reader sends a link to 3 other interested persons, it only takes 20 steps to join 3,486,784,401 people! You want to see it happen? Use your power!

3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 = 3,486,784,401


If you don't want to miss the next publication, then click here:

I would like to receive an email as soon as another article appears in English.

Please note that SPAMFIGHTER often sees my messages as SPAM. SPAMFIGHTER as political weapon? No, it is just the consequence of badly conceived principles of the program. If you subscribe to stay informed, please check your spamfolder regularly. And when you find messages from me there, please click UNBLOCK. I thank you very much in advance. - Rudo de Ruijter



And you know something is happening
But you don't know what it is
Do you, Mister Jones?

                                 Bob Dylan

Fortunately, we still have the euro...

Private banks must grow infinitely in order not to fail. That is why we have inflation and live according to the dogna of eternal economical growth.

Restrictions to grow beyond the country's borders would endanger the banks sooner or later. This was well understood by Pierre Werner, banker and prime minister of Luxembourg, who presented the first blue print for the common currency in 1970.

Already at that time, prominent economists had warned that because of the big economic differences this would lead to severe indebtment of the weaker countries. These problems were easy to predict. But debts mean extra income for the bankers. So the euro came and with it the problems.

Many euro-countries have severe financial problems by now. Many people still don't understand that the euro is not the solution, but the cause.

The problem? Because of the big differences between euro-countries the cost prices of products differ too. With the open borders, consumers prefer products from less expensive euro-countries. As a result, their local economy fails. At the same time, the euros leave the country as payment for the import-products. To continue to dispose of euros citizens and government must borrow more and more.. The country is trapped in growing debts...

Consecutively the banks raise the interest for the local government in such a way, it can only obtain further loans from the Troika (International Monetary Funds, European Central Bank, European Commission.)

To supply these loans, the Troika demands Draconic budget cuts. Public officers are fired, services come to a standstill, social achievements are broken down. The people are taught they would be still worse off without the euro. Also, all lucrative possessions of the country must be sold to foreign parties to lower the debt. A man of Goldman Sachs is appointed as governor.

Financiers earn billions of interest with these mountains of debt. To prevent that they risk losses because of impayments, the ESM-bank has been set up. (ESM stands for European Stability Mechanisme) The ESM may grab as much tax money as it wants from the treasuries of the eurocountries to make good the losses of the lenders, freely, without any democratic control and without limit.

The ministers of finance appoint themselves as governors of the ESM. (Signature of the first version of the ESM-treaty, 11 July 2011. By the way, this signature was illegal, because the Convention of Vienna, that sets the rules for treaties, does not mention ministers of finance as legal representatives of countries.)

Apparently because the US was not satisfied with this first version, it disappeared in the trash bin a few days later. A second version came on 2 February 2012, this time it was signed by EU-ambassadors. The treaty, however, is not a EU-treaty, but an international treaty. (The EU has not the right to extend its own competences and the ESM limits the competences of the national parliaments.) The rules of the EU don't apply to the ESM and the ESM doesn't have to justify its actions to anyone. No democratic control on the use of our tax money has been foreseen.

Unbelievable but true, the treaty has been ratified by the parliaments and senats of the 17 euro-countries.

This means that in each country a majority (and in some countries even a 2/3 majority) has voted in favor of the treaty. Curiously, that does not mean that those who voted in favor have read the text. At least, those of whom I have read comments in the press had, apparently, read a few lines, without understanding what the treaty was about. We should rather fear that hardly any representative has read the text, because for them, studying the text would have been a waste of time. Whatever the content, they have to vote the way they are ordered to by the leader of their political party. That is the way things go when coalitions are in power.

What we can conclude is that the lobby of the bankers and the europhiles have succeeded to convince enough leaders of political parties - a few persons in each country - to make a majority of representatives vote in favor of the treaty.

They voted in favor of the bankers, not for the people.

Barroso, president of the European Commission from 2004 to 2014.

It is the European Commission that, according to Barroso, should be the economic government of the Union, which defines the actions that national governments must carry out. (28.09.11)

With compliments to Peter Vlemmix

Rudo de Ruijter
Yannis Varoufakis
Costas Lapavitsas
James K. Galbraith
Gerard Dunénil
Michael Hudson
Ed Dolan
Jacques Nikonoff
Jean-Claude Paye
Eugénio Rosa
Jorge Figueiredo

Special thanks to:

Christine, Corinne, Francisco, Evelyne, Françoise, Gaël, Peter, Ingrid, Ivan, Krister, Jorge, Marie Carmen, Ruurd, Sabine, Lisa, Sarah, Valérie & Anonymous...

Acknowledgements for translations:

Alter Info
Carlo Pappalardo
Come Don Chisciotte
Ermanno di Miceli
Ivan Boyadjhiev
Jorge G-F
Lisa Youlountas
Jose Joaquin
Manuel Valente Lopes
Marcella Barbarino
Marie Carmen
Mary Beaudoin
Michel Ickx
Natalia Lavale
Nicoletta Forcheri
Peter George
Resistir Info
Traducteur sans frontière
Valérie Courteau


Do you want to translate too?

Information stops at the linguistic borders. If you speak more than one language, please help the articles cross these borders.
Please contact:
Rudo de Ruijter

Court Fool, 2011 - 2015