X


The secrets behind money:


The banking system in short



If you just sign here, I will give you a balance of $ 1,000 and you will owe me $ 1,000 plus interest.

Secrets of money, interest and inflation


From state debt to state money


A tale of two monetary systems


Towards a sound economy


Bank crisis? Reform!


Debit, credit, banco!


Banking explained:
the Derivative Scam


The secrets behind the euro:

Out of the euro, and then?


The secrets behind the European Union:


Stay quiet! We build Europe!

EUROPEAN ACTION AGAINST ESM!


ESM, the new European dictator!


ESM, a coup d'état in 17 countries!


ESM: How the Goldman Vampire Squid Just Captured Europe

Zeus rapes Europa



NATO rescues euro in Libya


Farewell to growth:

Outlook to 2100

World Energy and Population


Energy crisis:
Turning-point of humanity


The secrets behind the war in Iraq:


Cost, abuse and danger of the dollar


Iraq Memorial


The secrets behind the war in Afghanistan:

TAP: Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan gaz-pipeline project

Pipelines to 9/11


The secrets behind the accusations against Iran:


Raid on Nuclear Fuel Market


Wipe Israel from the map?


Facts and lies about the climate:


1: The clockwork of the Earth and Sun


2: The activity of the Sun


3: CO2: scare, claims and fraud...

 

Humor:


There are alternatives to capitalism...

Protest in Draguignan



Cartoons


 

Treaties:

Treaty establishing the European Union (EU)

Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Amendment article 136 TFEU

First version of the Treaty establishing the European Stability Mechanism (ESM)(not ratified)

Treaty establishing the European Stability Mechanism (ESM)

Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the economic and monetary union (TSCG)

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969


Who publishes the Fool's articles? StartPublishers

11 Septiembre 2001
24h Gold
321 Energy
Ad Broere
Advivo.com.br
Afghan.nl
Aftershock.su
Albe.ru
Aldeilis
Alexander's Gas and Oil
Alex Constantine's 9/11 Truthmove
Alfa Kappa
Aljazeera Com
Aljazeera Info
Altea te quiero verde
Alter du Lot
Alter Info
Altra Informazione
American Chronicle
American Iranian Friendship Committee
Amsterdam Post
Andalous.ma
Anonymous France
Anovis Anophelis
Antifascist Encyclopedia
Apocalypse Total
Aquarius Age
Argusoog
Arianna Editrice.it
ArmonyaX
Artikel 7 Nu
At-Park / АТ-парк
Atlas Vista Maroc
Au bout de la route
Avant de voter
Averdade vos libertara
Avicennesy
Avizora
A voz do povo
Baltimore Chronicle
Bankiv Tomske.ru
Beaujarret 50'z
Beez Libre Info
Before it is news
Belém Livre
Bernard Sady
Bezformata.ru
Biflatie.nl
Blogapares
Blog Chalouette
Blog Chatta.it
Blog économique et social
Blogg.org
Blog World-citizenship
Bobo in Paraguay
BOINNK!!!
BouBlog
Brasilianas.org
Brood en spelen
Bullion Management Group
Burbuja.info
Business-Gazeta.ru /
БИЗНЕС Online
Cafe 415
Candombeando
Cantv
Carla Noirci's Log
CASMII
Caveat emptor
CawAilleurs
CDU Arouca
Cenex.com.ua
CGT Santé 46
Chatta it
Chatta it
Chiado Editora
Chris Roubis
Come Don Chisciotte
Comité Valmy
Contre-Info
Correio Progressista
Corriera della Notte
Cosenostrea casanostra
Counter Currents
Crash Debug fr
Crise Systémique Globale
Critical Trend (bg)
Criticamente
Cross-Cultural Understanding
Daily Motion
Daily Times
Dandelion Salad
Dazibaoueb
Déborah 33 Epée
De Echte Denker
De Kelderlander
Démocratie réelle Nimes
De Waarheid Nu
Démocratie Réelle à Nimes maintenant
Démocratie royale
Democratische Partij v Solidariteit
Denissto.eu
De Reaguurder
De Vrije Chroniqueurs
Dialogue & Démocratie Française
Diário Liberdade
Diatala.org
Digitale Stad Eindhoven
Dimensional Bliss
Dire Giovani
Dissident News
Dit kan niet waar zijn.eu
Diário de Notícias - Cartaz
Dolezite.sk
ДОТУ.org.ua / Dotu.org.ua
Double Standards
Dove sono le ragazze
Doy Cinco
Dreamdash
Dutch Amazing Nieuws
Dwarslezing
E.J. Bron
Earth Matters
Económico Fórum pt
Economics Kiev /
Мировая и рыночная
экономика
Статьи и книги

EC-planet
Eco-Humanisme Radical.org
Edelmetaal.Info
Educate Yourself
E-Foro Bolivia
Égalité & Réconciliation
Eindtijd in beeld
Élections Algérie
EliteTrader.ru / Элитный Трейдер
El Libre Pensador
Elkhadra
Eltimir / Елтимир
End the ECB
End US Militarism
天涯社区 /
(End of the world community)

Enrico Sabatino
Es.Sott.net
Etienne Chouard
EU Alert
Europe 2020
Europlouf
Eurostaete eu
Eva Anárion
Evolution de notre civilisation
Fai te
FCCI
Ferra Mula
Filosofia e Tecnologia
Fimdostempos.net
Finanza.com Blog
Finanza Online
Focus στην Οικονομία
Fortune F. Desouche
Forum démocratique
Forum des Alternatives.org
Forum.for-ua.com
Forum Mondiale della Alternative
Four Winds
Francisco Trindade
Free Minds
Freedom Bytes
French News Online
French Revolution
Fronte di Liberazione dai banchieri
FTU.su
Fugada YouTube Forum
Future Fast Forward
Geen Flauwekul
Generaal Pardon
Geografia e Luta - Prof. Mazucheli
George Orwell Werkgroep
Gest Credit
Gianfranco Vizzotto
Gino Salvi
Global Echo
Global Economic Intersection
Global Faultlines
Global Order
Global Research
Global Systemic Crisis
Golden Heart
Gorod.Tomsk.ru
Город.Томск
Goto 2012
Goudstaven-goudstukken
草根金融服务社 /
(Grassroots Financial Service)

Grioo
Guerre Libre Info.org
Henry Makow
Het echte nieuws.be
Het uur van de waarheid
Hidden Mysteries
Ho visto cose che voi umani
Hubbert Peak
Huffington Post
Iceberg Finanza
Il nodo gordiano
Imperiya / Империя
Indebitati
Indymedia
Indymedia Italia
Info Guerilla
Infomare Per Resistere
Information Clearing House
Informazione in Rete
Infos différentes
Infowars Ireland
Institute of Evolutionary Economics
Instituto Reage Brasil
Intellezione
International Business Times
InvestGraf
Investors Hub
Iran Blog
Iran Daily
Iran File
IRIB Iran French Radio
Irish Public
Irish Timez
Islam City
Isxys / ΙΣΧΥΣ
Ivan Mutov
Jean Marie Lebraud
Joomla
Jornal Fraternizar
Jose Joa Net
Josè Maria Salvador
Journal la Mée
Journal Milénio
Journaux de Guerre
Kanie Tistory
Klein Paradijs
Klepsudra
Komitet / Комитет
Kostarof
L'éveil 2012
L'Observatoire de l'Immo
La banlieu s'exprime
Lanet Kiev
Las razones de Aristófanes
LeaksFree.com
Le Banquier Garou
Le Blog d'Eva
Le Blog de Nicole
Le Lot en Action
Le Metropole Cafe
Le Monde du Sud
Le Partisan de Gauche
Le Post
Les Indignés
Les moutons enragés
Leugens
Lettre d'Informations Stratégiques Internationales
Libera Mente Servo
Libertatum
L.I.E.S.I.
Lit Corner
L'Olandese volante
Luminária
Macua Blogs Moçambique
Manifeste pour un débat sur le libre échange
Mapeni School
Marianne2
Market Oracle cn
Market Oracle co.uk
MasterNewMedia
Mathaba News
Maurício Porto
Max 1967
Maxi News
MBM Hautetfort
Mecano Blog
Melochi
Mens en Politiek
Mercato Libero News
Metropolis
Mga Diskurso ni Doy
Michel Collon Info
Middle East Online
Mondialisation Ca
Money Files
Mouvement Politique d'Éducation Populaire
Na Sombra.org
Nato nella tana
Natural Money
Newropeans Magazine
News Follow Up
Newzz in Ukrain
Niburu
Nieuw-Nederland
Nieuws-Flash
Norma Tarozzi
Nota.to-p.net / НОТАРИАТ
Notizie Libere
Nous les dieux
Novusordoseclorum
NucNews
Nya Politiken
Ocastendo Blogs
Occupy Amsterdam
Occupy Network tv
Oil Crisis
Oko-planet.su / Око Планеты
Onderzoek 9/11
One Base.com
Ontdek Islam
Os Bárbaros
Osservatorio Sovranità Nazionale
Osvaldo Bertolino
Our World / НАШ МИР
Oxygene.re
Pakistan News Service
Palestine - Solidarité
Panier de Crabes
Paper Blog fr
Paperless Korea
Partage dialoguer avec jean loup
Parti de Gauche 34
Partido Comunista Brasileiro
Patrice Mars
PCF Bassin
PCF Cap Corse
Peace by Truth
Peak Oil .pl
Pensare Liberi News
Perunica
Peter Pan's Paradijs
Philippe Vedovati
Pintxo
Planeta Caos
Planete Non Violence
Plein Overheid
Politics & Current Affairs
Portal Luis Nassif
Post Jorion
Post Switch
Pragmatic Economist
Pravda / Правда
Primavera do 11
Project for the Old American Century
Prova Final
Quo Fata Ferunt
Raise the Hammer
Ravage Digitaal
Rayven
Real Infos
Real Wealth Society
Recuperare Credit
Relapsing Fever
Resistance
Resistance 71
Résistance FR
Resistenze.org
Resistir Info
Resurs.by
Robin Good
Rodon
Rol Club
Rue 89
Rus Nevod
Saura Plesio
Seigneuriage Blogspot
Sempre Vigili!
Shem.se
Siddharth Varadarajan
Signoraggio.it
Silver and Gold Shop
Silver Bear Cafe
Sociale Databank Nederland
Sociale Driegeleding
Sociologias
SOS-crise
Sott.net
Soutenir l'Afghanistan
Spartacus.info
Spazio Forum
Spiegelbeeld
Spraakloos
Sprookje Nieuws
Stampa Libera
Star People
Stienster Blogspot
Studien von Zeitfragen
Storyo.ru / Страницы истории
Suciologicus
Svobodnoslovo / Свободно слово
Tegen Onzin
The Movement
The People's Forum
The Pragmatic Economist
The Voice of Wakker Holland
The Wild, Wild Left
Tijdgeest Magazine
Tim's Journal
Toine van Bergen
TomskNet.ru / Город.Томск
To-p.biz
Top-débats.info
Tora Yeshua / תורה־ ישוע
Trademan.org
Transatlantic Information
Exchange System
Transition Town Breda
Transcom Se
Triplo II
Truth Spring
Truth Move 9/11
Tunisia Today
Uitpers
UKIP Hillingdon
Um Novo Despertar
Uruknet Info
Verborgen Nieuws
Vermelho.org.br
Verontruste Moeders
Veterans for America
Video data bg
Viewzone Magazine
Vilistia
Visionair.nl
Vision Démocrate.net
V-Kontakte.ru / Вконтакте
Voix dissonnantes
Voprosik / Вопросик
Voy Com
Vrijspreker
Vues du monde
Vyacheslav Burunov /
ВячеславБурунов
Wake Up From Your Slumber
Wall Street Pit
Want to know .nl
War and Peace / война и мир
We Are Change Holland
We Are Change Rennes
Welcome Back Uz
Werkgroep George Orwell
What really happened
Wij worden wakker
Wisdia Encyclopedia
Worldissue Blog bg
World Prout Assembly
Wroom.ru
YouTube
ZakonVremeni.ru /
ЗаконВремени
Zé Povinho no século XXI
Znanie-Vlast.ru
БезФормата.ru

 

Use Court Fool logos.

Logos for your website


From state debt to state money

by Rudo de Ruijter,
Independent researcher,
Netherlands
28 November 2011

Brussels wants the keys to the national treasuries of the 17 Euro-countries. Only this way can they save the Euro, they say. The ESM-treaty has already been signed. If the national parliamentarians ratify it, it will be the end of our sovereign democracies. Do we want that? Is there an alternative?

For those who know how the money system works, the logical solution to today's problems are fairly simple. A bank reform. On TV, at least in the Netherlands, the subject is still taboo [1], but if you want to know how it works, you can find an explanation here. (And if you already know all this, you can scroll immediately to 2. bank reform.)

1.   Today's money system

World wide bankers now have a money system, which is based on making money out of thin air. Nearly all money in bank accounts consists of thin air. There is only a tiny little fraction of real money in circulation. How is that?

Banking is bookkeeping

Each time a banker supplies a loan he does not hand out money, but just a balance. The loan consists of nothing else but numbers in the banker's books. Let's say you want a loan from your bank, the “Hard Up Bank”. On one side of the ledger the banker writes that you owe him 250,000 Euros and on the other side that he owes you 250,000 Euros. You see the amount appear in your account. You can spend it. Buy a little home? Okay, buy a little home.

Say you write a cheque to the seller of the house. He will bring that cheque to his bank, the "Red Shield Bank". That bank now wants to exchange the cheque at your bank, that is to say, against real money. Red Shield knows how his colleague has juggled the numbers from his hat and won't put up with thin air.

So now “Hard Up Bank” will have to come up with real money. However, in practice, this is not necessary most of the time, because Red Shield also supplies loans continually. Part of these loans will be spent with customers of Hard Up Bank. So, what happens is that Red Shield exchanges his claim of 250,000 Euros on Hard Up Bank against a claim of 250,000 Euros of Hard Up Bank on Red Shield.

Interest on thin air

This way banks can bring into circulation more loans all the time. One can of thin air is exchanged against another one and the customers don't notice how they are fooled. For, on this thin air, interest has to be paid.

Just for amusement an example where banks create millions without the need of a single cent of real money. In reality it is a bit more complex, but still.

We assume there are 3 banks which respectively serve 20%, 30% and 50% of the population. We suppose all three have the same type of customers, who have the same needs for loans and expenses. It is demonstrated that all payments the banks must execute at the moment the borrowers spend their loan are counterbalanced by the reception of these payments.

The borrowers at the first bank spend 20% of their loans with customers of their own bank, 30% with customers of Bank 30% and 50% with customers of Bank 50%. And so on. When we add all the amounts from the loans together, each bank has received as much as he created. Voilà, 100 million Euros created as balances in bank accounts without the need of one cent of real money.

When you ask bankers if they create money out of thin air, they generally reply that they only supply loans as far as they have balances in front of them. However, those balances increase automatically by the loans they supply all together.

Interbank payments

All payments proceed in the same way. When you make a payment to someone at another bank, then your banker must pay it to the other bank. But still the same day there will also be payments made by customers of other banks to customers at your bank. All these interbank payments are simply crossed out against each other.

What the banks finally pay to each other are the little differences between incoming and outgoing packets of payments. To facilitate these payments all banks have an account at the central bank. The amounts in these accounts are considered to be real money. (If they wished the banks could claim the entire amount in bank notes, as the central bank is authorized to print them.)

At the central bank the rule goes that banks must have a positive balance at the end of the day. When a banker is short of money, because he received a bit less than he paid out, he will borrow for the night from his colleague, who then has received a little more than he paid out. And when the colleagues don't trust each other, like during the credit crisis in 2008 and now again since a few months ago, the banker can borrow from the central bank for a quarter of a percent more.

Bankers among each other

Bankers have agreed upon rules among themselves about the required capital in relation to the calculated risks, like those of the outstanding loans. That capital is only a fraction of these risks, but in this way the creation of money out of thin air is tempered somewhat and banks get more in line with each other with the supply of loans. This increases the mutual confidence in lending money to each other, so that all of them can optimize their possibilities for benefits.

So, first of all, bankers are bankers among each other. When the customers of big Dutch banks were angry about the grab-culture at their bank and massively took their money to Triodos Bank (a kind of green bank), the big banks were short of that money. Fortunately for them, Triodos was not the meanest bank and ended up lending  the money back to those same Dutch banks. (Sorry folks, ethical banks simply don't exist, sympathetic looking banks do. But with such a money system, you can't expect otherwise, can you?)

But as soon as dark clouds show up at the horizon and severe losses threaten the banks, the mutual confidence is immediately gone. Then each banker tries to keep up his own trousers. Each of them tries to increase his cash reserves and lower his risks. As a result, over the period of months, the industry hardly gets any loans anymore and the waves of dismissals and failures start to ravage the country again. And if the bad weather stays, it can even last for years. Wonderful, isn't it, such a banking system?

Amounts move from account to account

Back to the sold house. The seller now disposes of 250,000 Euros of thin air, he will spend on his turn. This way, this so-called money goes from one account to the next. So even if you have never contracted a loan, in your account there is only thin air you received for your work or for goods you sold. If, for example, you are at the ING-bank, this bank only has 3 cents of real money for each Euro you have as a balance in your account.

All the time less money in your pockets

In fact, with thin air they multiplied the 3 cents by 33. This means that when you deposit a banknote of 100 Euros in your account at ING, they lend out 3300 euros. To put it an other way, for each Euro we don't keep in our pocket, the banks collect a multiple of interest.

Maybe you do understand now too, why the bankers seduce us to make our payments electronically as much as possible. Credit cards, bank cards, fuel cards, prepaid, chip and public transportation cards, it all serves just one goal: to make sure we need the least possible amount of cash money in our pockets.

However, this has also a reverse side. The cash reserves (the bank notes and the exchangeable balance at the central bank) do not only serve to give cash to the customers and to pay the little differences between incoming and outgoing payments, they are also the first reserves to absorb losses. But since the income at lower cash reserve percentages increases disproportionally, the temptation to take more risks is big. This way, with our modern plastic money we contribute to the reckless loan behavior of our bankers.

Let us see what happens when we bring a bank note of 100 Euros to our bank and deposit it in our account. At 3% of cash reserves the bank only has 3 cents for each Euro in your account.

.

In the right column you see that the revenues rise disproportionally when the cash reserve percentage lowers. And - the other way round - if you want to go back from 3% to 4% with the same amount of cash reserves, you need to get rid of 1/4 of the outstanding loans...

All amounts are temporary

At agreed moments you will have to pay back the balance you received from Hard Up Bank. From the pool of all "money" in circulation you have to earn enough to pay the installments. Then Hard Up Bank writes in his book that the amount you owe him is decreased and he decreases the amount he owes you. You see the amount disappear from your account. In this way the created balances disappear out of circulation again. That is a decrease of the "money" in the country.

Interest

The interest you pay does not disappear from circulation. With it the banker pays all his costs (like interest, insurances, staff, maintenance, invoices of the companies that supply E-banking etc.) and the capital is extended to allow him to lend out still more next time.

“Money mass” must grow

The classic risk for the bankers is that borrowers don't pay back their loans or only pay back partially. And when the pawn appears to be insufficient, he will stay with problems in his book keeping, meaning with amounts that sooner or later he will have to book as losses.

To minimize the risk of defaults of payment the banks take care that more and more loans are brought into circulation. For the more "money" is added to what is in circulation, the less each unit becomes worth. That is what is well known as inflation. The amount the borrower must pay back is set. And because this amount over the course of the loan becomes worth less, he can earn it more easily. If he must pay 6% of interest and the inflation is 2%, the load of the interest is 1/3 less. [graphic]. In this way the number of defaults of payments is considerably reduced.

By the way, the advantage for the borrowers exactly equals the loss of value that the users of the money experience. In fact, as users, they pay a part of the interest too.

Working harder all the time

It is this same inflation that causes we must work harder all the time. Each time more "money" comes into circulation, we must try to earn more, if we don't want to get poorer.

Of course a central banker will never tell us that the growth of money is a need for the bankers. The official pretext is that inflation leads to more economic activity.

And that, in turn, is the origin of the wide spread belief that an economy must grow to be sound. A very dangerous fairytale. Eternal economic growth is impossible on a finite Earth. And the longer we continue on this path, the more we destroy. What we can say is that a money system that needs a growing mass of money to function, is not suited for a sustainable society.

State debt

Our government disposes of "money" by levying taxes. With these taxes different things can be financed that are important for all of us together, like for instance dikes, roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, police, army and so on. It regularly happens that the government spends money before the corresponding taxes have been levied. In today's system the government must then borrow money and pay interest on it. That is the well known state debt or public debt. We may be accustomed to it, but in fact it is something weird. Within the community people execute tasks for the community, everyone is paid for his contribution and subsequently there is a debt left over. And on that debt, all of us pay interest via extra taxes.

Money creation by privately led banks

This is exclusively caused by the fact that parliamentarians in the past have ceded the creation of money to private bankers. This happened at a time that people valued the fairytale that said only bankers could keep the monetary household in good shape. If the government would bring the money into circulation, that would surely lead to a disaster!

Democracy without money

The result is that we still pretend to live in democracy, while one of the major attributes of society, the creation of money, is in the hands of private bankers. De Nederlandse Bank N.V. (the Dutch central bank) is ruled by private persons and is independent from the government. Before, they also independently set the interest rate "in the interest of the economy", as they called it. Now, this is done by the European Central Bank (ECB), where the 17 independent central banks of the eurozone are the owners and managers.

One interest rate for all

The ECB has engaged the impossible challenge to set one interest rate for the 17 different countries, with totally different economies, which have very different potential for productivity. Of course, it is completely impossible to determine an interest rate that has the optimal effect for all countries. A change of interest rate can only be beneficial for one or some countries. The other countries bear the consequences.

The euro, the most expensive money experiment ever

The euro will probably be remembered as the most expensive money experiment ever. Since the start of the project in 1970, it was already known that the experiment was doomed to fail, but bankers and hard headed politicians pushed for the common currency anyway. The point is that a common currency can only work in an economically homogeneous area. [2] [3] [4] Here is why.

When consumers, in countries with fewer possibilities for productivity, prefer cheaper and better products from abroad, the exterior debt will increase. At the same time the country's own productivity will decrease. A country disposing of its own money can then devaluate it. That makes the imported products more expensive for its own population and the export products cheaper for foreign purchasers. The debt will decrease and the productivity increase again. Devaluations were very common before the Euro started. The Euro works like a fixed exchange rate. Less productive countries are trapped like rats. They will never be able to get out of debts again. That is why the chosen method of loading still more debts on these countries is a strange and ill one.

Euro coupled with EU-membership

The bankers have succesfully lobbied for the rule that we can't leave the euro without leaving the EU. Well, that kills two flies with one blow.

The EU

More and more people become aware that the EU is much less democratic and social than the citizens in Europe want. Although it was that way right from the beginning, many are finding out only now that the European Parliament is a mockery and not a real parliament with democratic power. Also, more and more people are finding out the European Commission (EC) and the ECB draw all power towards them. By the way, for the EC and the ECB the ESM-treaty [5] will be the breakthrough that puts all national parliaments off the side. For them the ratification of this treaty seems to be a piece of cake, as most parliamentarians are still sleeping or cannot believe it. (Or are they accomplices?)

The European Union has the free market economy as laid down principle. Meanwhile, almost everyone has understood that the deregulating of banks, the privatization of infrastructures and the abolishment of governmental tasks lead to a harsh society harassed by crises. Those principles are outdated. The partisans of these principles will only succeed by imposing them by violence. Greece won't be the last victim.

The IMF-scenario

The EC and the ECB now cooperate with the IMF to crush countries with too high debts under still higher debts. The scenario to seize power has been applied by the IMF many times over the past fifty years. That scenario goes like this: maneuver a country into difficulties, and as soon as is gets into debt, crush it under gigantic loans in a such way it cannot even pay the interest. Subsequently keep the country under guardianship and make sure the government gets completely weakened by imposing ever more spending cuts. Let the population bleed, then it will be content more quickly when they get some air. And as soon as things are severely disorganized, let foreign investors buy the country's wealth and introduce an absolute free market economy.

We too

Anyone who thinks it over for a minute sees that with the scenario of the emergency funds all Euro countries end up in debt. This too has already been anticipated in this criminal scenario. The massive loans first serve as a pretext to impose a guardianship. As soon as this is accomplished, they can declare the country will never be able to pay back its loans. And with these broken loans they can maneuver their next victims into debt; these are the governments that warranted these loans. They will have to cut spending to pay for the losses. And for all countries the same refrain will be repeated over and over again, that governments must cut spending, cut spending, cut spending. Until hardly anything is left of the role and function of the national governments and Brussels can take control. Of course this will be accompanied by enormous social unrest. You can read the rest in Naomie Klein's book, The Shock Doctrine.

 

2.   The bank reform


State money

The solution is simple. In stead of pouring dozens of billions more into a Euro that is doomed to disappear sooner or later and in stead of letting us prescribe cuts in public spending by the undemocratic European Commission and the ECB, we can introduce state money, also called public money. (This is NOT the same thing as the money we used to have before the Euro! That would not solve our problems!)

Technically this can be done rather simply. In stead of today's central bank, a new central bank will be established, that is to say, a central bank of the state. It will fall under the responsibility of the Ministry of Finance and be controlled by the Parliament. A commission of well formed people will watch over the long term interests of the money system.

This state bank will be the only bank authorized to create money. All loans will be supplied in state money, be it in electronic form or in cash. It will be prohibited for commercial banks and financial institutions to create balances out of thin air. All new balances must be fully backed by state money. Today's banks stay responsible for the loans in Euros they have outstanding at the moment of the reform. As far as they wish, they can become middlemen between the state bank and the public for the supply of loans and they can manage the customers' accounts in name of the state bank. In this case nothing changes for the public in their existing accounts. The balances in Euros will be transformed 1:1 to state money. As middlemen the banks don't receive interest but a fee for their services.

Emission of state money

The emission of state money delivers a comparable amount of Euros. These can be kept by the state bank for the payment of debts and also as enormous strategic reserve. I think it is not unthinkable that at some point of time the new state money will be attacked on the exchange markets. We would be about the only country in the world with its own state money and the mighty private bankers will not gratefully accept that.

No spending cuts

The motive for today's spending cuts are the gigantic loans that the IMF, the EC and the ECB have mischievously loaded on Greece, while the country was already struggling with severe debts. It was foreseeable that after the seizure of power of the IMF, the EC and the ECB the loans would be declared unrecoverable and that the losses would be loaded on the eurocitizens in other countries.

Not so long ago the rescue funds EFSF had a lending capacity of 440 billion Euros. That was an average of 1320 Euros per eurocitizen. On 27 October 2011 250 billions were left, when the heads of state of the euro-countries made one trillion (1,000 billions) out of it, thanks to a bookkeeping trick. (Yes indeed, the thin air formula.) Of course we are now guarantors for these 1,000 billion Euros, or to put it otherwise, an average of 3,300 Euros for each and every eurocitizen. When the following emergency funds, the ESM, will get ratified by the national parliaments, an additional obligation comes on top of it of 700 billion Euros (2,100 Euros per euro-citizen). Subsequently, this ESM funds can be raised indefinitely without the approval of the national parliaments.

So the motive for the spending cuts doesn't lay in the national situations of the euro-countries. Of course, each country has its particular problems that ask for appropriate measures, but that does not necessarily mean we would have to give up our government and our social, cultural and other achievements.

Let us end the Euro, end the EU and end the spending cuts.

Pension funds

You can save money during your entire life for your pension, but what you can do with it greatly depends on the situation at that moment. Already before 1980 it was obvious that around 2015 a huge grey wave would arrive of people of 65 years and older, that would be faced by an ever decreasing portion of working people. Pension funds have made the premium payers believe, they would receive a value guaranteed pension, something they should never have promised with this predictable situation.

The last generation of pension receivers, by the favorable relation between a big working population and relatively few pensioned people, could be paid directly out of the collected premiums from the working people. That time is over.

Pension funds often have a portion of the paid in premiums invested in state obligations. So in fact, part of the pensions is already paid by the government with our tax money. Another part of the pensions comes from the income from foreign investments. To say it otherwise, from the profits of companies elsewhere in the world. To say it still otherwise, from the fact that workers elsewhere in the world execute part of their work to pay our pensions. So, a kind of financial colonialism.

Personally I would rather prefer we take care of ourselves and our elderly. In my opinion we have enough room for that, when, progressively we direct our economy towards sustainability and cooperation, in stead of competition and financial profitability.

Cheaper money system

The state money system can function much less expensively than the private money system we now have. In the first place all interest goes to the Treasury for the benefit of the population. Also, the interest can stay lower, because the state bank does not need to make benefits. (No fat salaries for financial boys, no bonuses, no expensive building up of capital.)

The state bank does not need a separate capital, because all money belongs to the community. In fact we, together, guarantee the value of our money. Defaults of payment can be treated the same way as tax debts.

Permanent money

At the moment all money in circulation consists of loans that must be replaced by new ones all the time. However, the state bank can decide to leave a part of all money in circulation permanently, to lower the need for loans. (This should be accompanied by appropriate fiscal measures.) In the new system the government can very easily create a portion of permanent money by spending an amount of money (=bring money into circulation) without levying the corresponding taxes.

Inflation

The state money system, by itself, has no need for inflation. It can even continue to work perfectly in times of deflation. Borrowers will no longer know the relative advantage of the decrease of value of the installments. By contrast, the cost of interest can always be lower and for democratically wished investments that can even stay nil. (And if a low interest rate causes trouble in the international context, the cost of interest can be partly or completely compensated fiscally.)

State debt

Today's state debt comes from state expenses for which no taxes have/had been levied in advance. This state debt can be ended in the shortest possible way with newly created state money. That stops the interest payments. After that, the concept of state debt can go into the waste bin, because the state, when needed can simply use its own bank. For budget excesses the allowed cases and limits can be described, as well as conditions for exceptions, for which we can think of a requirement of 2/3 chamber majority. The rules can be anchored within the constitution.

Democratic influence

The decreased influence of bankers on the shaping of the society will open more room for democratic influence. That offers the possibility to engage in a transition towards a sustainable society. Information, involvement and dictate by citizens will be of high importance to succeed. I think this may need improved democratic structures.

Europe

The European Union, daily, offers a lot of ease in the international trade. But isn't the price getting too high? Do we want to exchange our sovereign democracies against the dictatorial rule of the European Commission that wants to cut to the bone all achievements and transform the whole society into a financial playground? Personally, I think these eases are paid way too dear then.

The cooperation with European partners will not stop when we step out of the EU. Real cooperation is based on trade, industry and tourism and on everything that serves mutual interest.

 

Notes and references:

[1] On 25 October 2011, in the Dutch talk show of Pauw en Witteman, Sunny Bergman was resolutely silenced by Ewald Engelen, who presents himself as financial-geologist and came to highlight the cisis-story from the mainstream point of view. After EE has presented the desaster tersely, Sunny Bergman notes: "But it is also correct to question the economic growth model by itself." EE, as if he were bitten by a dog: "Yes, that is a very pleasant, luxurious position. We really should do that. At the moment you drive in a very pleasant nice car" - SB: "I don't have a nice car" - EE: "No, okay, and you can buy tasteful food at Market, but for very many other people this is just an exercise that doesn't occur in their image of the world." (And thus, in particular, not in the image of the world of this Ewald himself.)

[2] In the studies about optimum currency areas we can distinguish those focusing on the needed conditions and those from after 1970 (when politicians had decided they wanted a single currency in Europe) focusing on cost and benefits.

Roman Horvath and Lubos Komarek in “OPTIMUM CURRENCY AREA THEORY: AN APPROACH FOR THINKING ABOUT MONETARY INTEGRATION” (2002)

“It is possible to distinguish two major streams of the optimum currency area literature. The first stream tries to find the crucial economic characteristics to determine where the (illusionary) borders for exchange rates should be drawn (1960s-1970s). The second stream (1970s-till now) assumes that any single country fulfills completely the requirements to make it an optimal member of a monetary union. As a result, the second approach does not continue in the search for characteristics, identified as important for choosing the participants in an optimum currency area. This literature focuses on studying the costs and the benefits to a country intending to participate in a currency area.”

http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/1539/1/WRAP_Horvath_twerp647.pdf , page 7.

Friedman put forward the advantages of flexible exchange rates between countries as follows: As it is commonly observed, the country’s prices and wages are relatively rigid and factors are immobile among the countries. As a result, under the negative demand or supply shock the only instrument to avoid higher inflation or unemployment is the change in the flexible exchange rate (that means appreciation or depreciation of the currency). This brings the economy back to the initial external and internal equilibrium. (...) Under the fixed exchange rate regime there would always be the unpleasant impact on unemployment or inflation.

http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/1539/1/WRAP_Horvath_twerp647.pdf , page 8.

[3] Yrd. Doç. Dr. Hüseyin Mualla YÜCEOL, Mersin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Maliye Bölümü, in “WHY THE EUROPEAN UNION IS NOT AN OPTIMAL CURRENCY AREA: THE LIMITS OF INTEGRATION”

Europe is not an optimal currency area. Although, On January 1, 1999, 11 EU countries initiated an EMU by adopting common currency, the euro, the EU does not appear to satisfy all of the criteria for an optimum currency area. Then, joining the EU is not identical with joining the euro for both old members and new members.

http://eab.ege.edu.tr/pdf/6_2/C6-S2-M6.pdf , page 66

[4] Paul de Grauwe, excerpts of  speech

“With up to twenty-seven members instead of the present twelve, the challenge for ensuring a smooth functioning of the enlarged Eurozone will be daunting. The reason is that in such a large group the probability of what economists call ‘asymmetric shocks’ will increase significantly. This means that some countries may experience a boom and inflationary pressures while others experience deflationary forces. If too many asymmetric shocks occur, the ECB will be paralyzed, not knowing whether to increase or to reduce the interest rates. As a result, member countries will often feel frustrated with the ECB policies that do not (and cannot) take into account the different economic conditions of the individual member countries. This leads us to the question whether the enlarged EMU will, in fact, be an optimal currency area.” (...)

“If a country is hit by negative shocks brought about by agglomeration effects, the wage cuts necessary to deal with these shocks will inevitably be very large. To give an example: If Ford Motor were to close down a plant in Belgium and to invest in Poland instead, the wage cut of Belgian workers that would convince Ford Motor not to make this move would have to be 50% or more given that the wage not feasible, then flexibility dictates that the Belgian workers be willing to move.”

http://mostlyeconomics.wordpress.com/2010/06/21/were-europes-curent-problems-never-imagined/ 

[5]

ESM, the new European dictator! (article)
http://www.courtfool.info/en_ESM_the_new_European_dictator.htm

ESM, the new European dictator!  (video, 3:50)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxMOW94V6xQ

ESM, a coup d'état in 17 countries!
http://www.courtfool.info/en_ESM_a_coup_d_etat_in_17_countries.htm

 

Free of copyright
If you wish you may freely copy, forward and publish this article in newspapers, magazines or on websites. I appreciate when you indicate a link to the origial article on www.courtfool.info.

 

If you don't want to miss the next publication, then click here:

I would like to receive an email as soon as another article appears in English.

Please note that SPAMFIGHTER often sees my messages as SPAM. SPAMFIGHTER as political weapon? No, it is just the consequence of badly conceived principles of the program. If you subscribe to stay informed, please check your spamfolder regularly. And when you find messages from me there, please click UNBLOCK. I thank you very much in advance. - Rudo de Ruijter

 

StartUpperRightColumn




български   čeština   Dansk   Deutsch   English   español   Français   italiano   magyar   Nederlands   português   română   slovenčina   slovenščina   suomi   svenska  



deutsch, english, español, français, italiano, română.

Help spread this message!
Click here for more info
(please be patient, slow link)

 

Autores:
Rudo de Ruijter
Yannis Varoufakis
Costas Lapavitsas
James K. Galbraith
Gerard Dunénil
Michael Hudson
Ed Dolan
Jacques Nikonoff
Jean-Claude Paye
Eugénie Rosa
Jorge Figueiredo

Brussels committed a coup d'état in the 17 countries of the euro-zone.


It is the European Commission that according to its President Barroso should be the economic government of the Union, which defines the actions that national governments must carry out. (28.09.11)

A new treaty will allow Brussels to take unlimited money from the states vaults to rescue the euro.


The dictatorship of the ESM robs the Treasuries in 3'51''

Of course, the European Union does not want the citizens to learn about it.

On the internet they made available only one copy of the text of this treaty: in english!

(96,5% of the euro-citizens speak other languages!)

This European Treaty has been signed 11 July '11 and is called the European Stability Mechanism, ESM, a kind of permanent rescue fund with unlimited power and unlimited access to the Treasuries of the 17 countries.

Curiously, not a single newspaper, not nationally nor internationally has spent a title on this treaty.


The Ministers of Finance proclame themselves Governors of the ESM. (Signature of the first version of the ESM-treaty, 11 July 2011)

Me and others denounced the irregularity of the treaty. Apparently the instigators of the treaty were not satisfied either and wanted a much more extended treaty. So Brussels had to come up with a second version. This time it was signed by the Ambassadors of the countries. That was on 2 February 2012.

Once again, the press stayed quiet and even today, only very few Europeans know about the monstre that disguised as merciful Samaritan is getting ready to overrule our democracies.

Meanwhile the parliaments of the 17 eurocountries have ratified the treaty. Over 2,000 so called democratic represtatives corrupted the fundament of our parlementarian democracies.


When consumers prefer products from other euro-countries, the euros leave the country and the country gets indebted...

StartJoinTranslators

Special thanks to:

Christine, Corinne, Francisco, Evelyne, Françoise, Gaël, Peter, Ingrid, Ivan, Krister, Jorge, Marie Carmen, Ruurd, Sabine, Lisa, Sarah, Valérie and Anonymous...


Translate too!

Information stops at the barriers of languages. If you speak more than one langage and want to help the court fool crossing these barriers, please, translate an article. Contact: courtfool@xs4all.nl Thank you very much in advance!

StartTranslators

Acknowledgements for translations:

Alter Info
Carlo Pappalardo
Come Don Chisciotte
Ermanno di Miceli
Ivan Boyadjhiev
Jorge G-F
Lisa Youlountas
Jose Joaquin
Manuel Valente Lopes
Marcella Barbarino
Marie Carmen
Mary Beaudoin
Michel Ickx
Natalia Lavale
Nicoletta Forcheri
Peter George
Resistir Info
Traducteur sans frontière
Valérie Courteau

Court Fool, 2011 - 2013