courtfool.info
The court fool reveals
secrets behind world events
list of articles
StartListOfArticles

Rutte versus Erdogan 12 March 2017
Burada patron değil, Erdogan değilim !

Rutte versus Erdogan 12 March 2017 Dutch prime minister prevents Turkish ministers from attending a pro-Erdogan meeting


The secrets behind money The secrets behind money:

The bankers hat

The magic of bankers The magic of bankers

Always growing debts

The cancer of bankers The cancer of bankers

sign a loan
If you just sign here, I will give you a balance of $ 1,000 and you will owe me $ 1,000 plus interest.

The banking system in short The banking system in short

exchanging mutual claims
With just a tiny little bit of money bankers can pay each other millions...

Secrets of money, interest and inflation Secrets of money, interest and inflation

Debit, credit, banco! Debit, credit, banco!

Canadas_National_Debt_1940_1987
Politicians give billions away to private bankers...

A tale of two monetary systems A tale of two monetary systems

falling banknotes

Private banks or a bank of the government Private banks or a bank of the government. A comparaison.

From state debt to state money From state debt to state money

Towards a sound economy Towards a sound economy

Bank crisis? Reform!

Bank crisis? Reform! Bank crisis? Reform!

Wall_Street_Bull

the Derivative Scam Banking explained:
the Derivative Scam



The secrets behind the euro The secrets behind the euro:

The madness of the euro

The madness of the euro The madness of the euro

heavy euro

Out of the euro, and then? Out of the euro, and then?

hungry euro

ESM, the new European dictator! ESM, the new European dictator!

YouTube: The new European dictator

ESM robs the Treasuries in 3'51'' ESM robs the Treasuries in 3'51''

Keep quiet! We build Europe!
Keep quiet! We build Europe!"

ESM, a coup d'état in 17 countries! ESM, a coup d'état in 17 countries!

Zeus rapes Europa

Zeus rapes Europa Zeus rapes Europa

Goldman Sachs captures Europe

How the Goldman Vampire Squid Just Captured Europe ESM: How the Goldman Vampire Squid Just Captured Europe

NATO rescues euro in Libya

NATO rescues euro in Libya NATO rescues euro in Libya

Obama and Sarkozy in Libya
Obama and Sarkozy in Libya

Hillary Clinton's emails about Libya Hillary Clinton's emails about Libya

Euromania

EUROMANIA by Peter Vlemmix EUROMANIA by Peter Vlemmix

Ascensao_e_queda_do_euro

Autores:
Rudo de Ruijter
Yannis Varoufakis
Costas Lapavitsas
James K. Galbraith
Gerard Dunénil
Michael Hudson
Ed Dolan
Jacques Nikonoff
Jean-Claude Paye
Eugénio Rosa
Jorge Figueiredo

Exceptional offer
Exceptional offer:

Ivan Boyadjhiev, Confused Perspectives, 40 x 50 cm

Ivan Boyadjhiev, Confused Perspectives, 40 x 50 cm Ivan Boyadjhiev
Confused Perspectives
40 x 50 cm
Click here...




The secrets behind democracies The secrets behind democracies:

Power to the people

The road to democracy The road to democracy

The bizarre Dutch referendum

The bizarre Dutch referendum The bizarre Dutch referendum

Chicken_parliament

The chicken-parliament The chicken-parliament


secrets behind the war in Iraq The secrets behind the war in Iraq:

dollar_bill

Cost, abuse and danger of the dollar Cost, abuse and danger of the dollar

Iraq_Memorial

Iraq Memorial Iraq Memorial


The secrets behind the war in Afghanistan The secrets behind the war in Afghanistan:

Pipelines_to_9_11 / WTC

Pipelines to 9/11 Pipelines to 9/11


The secrets behind the accusations against IranThe secrets behind the accusations against Iran:

Raid on the nuclear fuel market

Raid on Nuclear Fuel Market Raid on Nuclear Fuel Market

Wipe Israel from the map? Wipe Israel from the map?


Farewell to growthFarewell to growth:

outlook_population

World Energy and Population World Energy and Population

World_Energy_Imports_Exports

Turning-point of humanity Energy crisis:
Turning-point of humanity




Facts and lies about the climateFacts and lies about the climate:

Climate Conference Paris 2015

Climate Conference Paris 2015 Climate Conference Paris 2015

The clockwork of the Earth and Sun

The clockwork of the Earth and Sun 1: The clockwork of the Earth and Sun

The activity of the Sun

The activity of the Sun 2: The activity of the Sun

CO2: scare, claims and fraud...

CO2: scare, claims and fraud... 3: CO2: scare, claims and fraud...

Uncover secrets Uncover secrets:

Sleepwalking

Wake up citizens? Wake up citizens?


HumorHumor:

Protest in Draguignan
There are alternatives to capitalism...

Protest in Draguignan Protest in Draguignan

Cartoons

More cartoons Click here fore many more original cartoons...


Treaties Treaties:


Treaty establishing the European Union (EU) Treaty establishing the European Union (EU)

Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Amendment article 136 TFEU Amendment article 136 TFEU

First version of the ESM First version of the Treaty establishing the European Stability Mechanism (ESM)(not ratified)

ESM Treaty establishing the European Stability Mechanism (ESM)

TSCG Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the economic and monetary union (TSCG)

Vienna Convention 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969

Websites having published articles of the court fool Do you want to know who publishes the fool's articles?

Publishers

StartPublishers



11 Septiembre 2001
24h Gold
321 Energy
Aardewerk.be
Academie-Gaullisme
Ad Broere
Advivo.com.br
Afghan.nl
Aftershock News (ru)
Albe.ru
Aldeilis
Alexander's Gas and Oil
Alex Constantine's 9/11 Truthmove
Alfa Kappa
Aljazeera Com
Aljazeera Info
Altea te quiero verde
Alter du Lot
Alter Info
Altra Informazione
American Chronicle
American Iranian Friendship Committee
Amsterdam Post
Anarchiel
Andalous.ma
Anonymous France
Anovis Anophelis
Antifascist Encyclopedia
Apocalypse Total
Apokalyps Nu
Apollo Solaris
Aquarius Age
Argusoog
Arianna Editrice.it
ArmonyaX
Articles du jour
Artikel 7 Nu
At-Park / АТ-парк
Atlas Vista Maroc
Au bout de la route
Avant de voter
Averdade vos libertara
Avicennesy
Avizora
A voz do povo
Baltimore Chronicle
Bankiv Tomske.ru
Banque publique .be
Beaujarret 50'z
Beez Libre Info
Before it is news
Belém Livre
Bernard Sady
Bezformata.ru
Biflatie.nl
Blogapares
Blog Chalouette
Blog Chatta.it
Blog économique et social
Blogg.org
Blog World-citizenship
Bobo in Paraguay
BOINNK!!!
BouBlog
Brasilianas.org
Brood en spelen
Bullion Management Group
Burbuja.info
Business-Gazeta.ru /
БИЗНЕС Online
Cafe 415
Candombeando
Cantv
Carla Noirci's Log
CASMII
Caveat emptor
CawAilleurs
CDU Arouca
Cenex.com.ua
CGT Santé 46
Chatta it
Chipstone
Chris Roubis
Chiado Editora
Club Invest
Cogito ergo sum
Collectif de Remises En Causes de Besançon
Come Don Chisciotte
Comité Valmy
Conscience Citoyenne Responsable
Contre-Info
Correio Progressista
Corriera della Notte
Cosenostrea casanostra
Counter Currents
Crash Debug fr
Crise Systémique Globale
Critical Trend (bg)
Criticamente
Cross-Cultural Understanding
Dagboek van een belegger
Daily Motion
Daily Times
Dandelion Salad
Dazibaoueb
Déborah 33 Epée
De Echte Denker
De Kelderlander
De Lange Mars
Démocratie réelle Nimes
De Waarheid Nu
Démocratie capitaliste
Démocratie Réelle à Nimes maintenant
Démocratie royale
Democratische Partij v Solidariteit
Denissto.eu
De Reaguurder
De Vrije Chroniqueurs
Dialogue & Démocratie Française
Diário Liberdade
Diatala.org
Digitale Stad Eindhoven
Dimensional Bliss
Dire Giovani
Dissident News
Dit kan niet waar zijn.eu
Diário de Notícias - Cartaz
Djamazz Centerblog
Docplayer.ru
Dolezite.sk
ДОТУ.org.ua / Dotu.org.ua
Double Standards
Dove sono le ragazze
Doy Cinco
Dreamdash
Dutch Amazing Nieuws
Dwarslezing
E.J. Bron
Earth Matters
Económico Fórum pt
Economics Kiev /
Мировая и рыночная
экономика
Статьи и книги

EC-planet
Eco-Humanisme Radical.org
Edelmetaal.Info
Educate Yourself
E-Foro Bolivia
Égalité & Réconciliation
Eindtijd in beeld
Élections Algérie
EliteTrader.ru / Элитный Трейдер
El Libre Pensador
Elkhadra
Eltimir / Елтимир
End the ECB
End US Militarism
天涯社区 /
(End of the world community)

Enrico Sabatino
Entrelector
Es.Sott.net
Etienne Chouard
EU Alert
Europe 2020
Europlouf
Eurostaete eu
Eva Anárion
Evolution de notre civilisation
Facebook
Fai te
FCCI
FDESOUCHE
Ferra Mula
Filosofia e Tecnologia
Fimdostempos.net
Finanza.com Blog
Finanza Online
Focus στην Οικονομία
Folha diferenciada
Forexaw
Fortune F. Desouche
Forum démocratique
Forum des Alternatives.org
Forum.for-ua.com
Forum Mondiale della Alternative
Four Winds
Francisco Trindade
François de Siebenthal
Free Minds
Freedom Bytes
French News Online
French Revolution
Fronte di Liberazione dai banchieri
FTU.su
Fugada YouTube Forum
Future Fast Forward
Gabriele van Doorn
Geen Flauwekul
Generaal Pardon
Geografia e Luta - Prof. Mazucheli
Geopolitica blog
George Orwell Werkgroep
Gest Credit
Gianfranco Vizzotto
Gino Salvi
Global Echo
Global Economic Intersection
Global Faultlines
Global Order
Global Research
Global Systemic Crisis
Golden Heart
Gorod.Tomsk.ru
Город.Томск
Goto 2012
Goudstaven-goudstukken
草根金融服务社 /
(Grassroots Financial Service)

Grioo
Guerre Libre Info.org
Henry Makow
Het echte nieuws.be
Het uur van de waarheid
Hidden Mysteries
Ho visto cose che voi umani
Holland 4 MPE
Ho visto cose che voi umani
Hubbert Peak
Huffington Post
Iceberg Finanza
Il nodo gordiano
Imperiya / Империя
Indebitati
Indymedia
Indymedia Portland
Info Guerilla
Infomare Per Resistere
Information Clearing House
Informazione in Rete
Infos différentes
Infowars Ireland
Institute of Evolutionary Economics
Instituto Reage Brasil
Intellezione
Intermarket & more
International Business Times
InvestGraf
Investors Hub
Iran Blog
Iran Daily
Iran File
IRIB Iran French Radio
Irish Public
Irish Timez
Irissan
Islam City
Isxys / ΙΣΧΥΣ
Ivan Mutov
Jean Marie Lebraud
Joomla
Joop.nl
Jornal Fraternizar
Jornalggn.com.br
Jose Joa Net
Josè Maria Salvador
Journal la Mée
Journal Milénio
Journaux de Guerre
Kanie Tistory
Klein Paradijs
Klepsudra
Kollinos
Komitet / Комитет
Kostarof
L'éveil 2012
L'Observatoire de l'Immo
La banlieu s'exprime
Lanet Kiev
Las razones de Aristófanes
LeaksFree.com
Le Banquier Garou
Le Blog d'Eva
Le Blog de Nicole
Legion 5-9
Legio Victrix
Le Lot en Action
Le Metropole Cafe
Le Monde du Sud
Le Partisan de Gauche
Le Post
Les Indignés
Les moutons enragés
Leugens
Lettre d'Informations Stratégiques Internationales
Liberamenteservo.it
Libertatum
L.I.E.S.I.
Lit Corner
L'Olandese volante
Luminária
Macua Blogs Moçambique
Magok Vagyunk
Manifeste pour un débat sur le libre échange
Mapeni School
Marianne2
Marista Urru
Market Oracle cn
Market Oracle co.uk
MasterNewMedia
Mathaba News
Maurício Porto
Max 1967
Maxi News
MBM Hautetfort
Mecano Blog
Melochi
Mens en Politiek
Mercato Libero News
Metropolis
Mga Diskurso ni Doy
Michel Collon Info
Middle East Online
Mondialisation Ca
Money Files
Mouvement Politique d'Éducation Populaire
Na Sombra.org
Nato nella tana
Natural Money
Nervyoko-bis
Newropeans Magazine
News Follow Up
Newzz in Ukrain
Niburu
Nieuw-Nederland
Nieuws-Flash
Norma Tarozzi
Nota.to-p.net / НОТАРИАТ
Notizie Libere
Notizie Silcea
Nous les dieux
Novusordoseclorum
NucNews
Nya Politiken
Ocastendo Blogs
Occupy Amsterdam
Occupy Network tv
Oil Crisis
Olo's Ramblings
Oko-planet.su / Око Планеты
Onderzoek 9/11
One Base.com
Ons geld
Ontdek Islam
Openbare Bank be
Os Bárbaros
Osservatorio Sovranità Nazionale
Osvaldo Bertolino
Our World / НАШ МИР
Oxygene.re
Pakistan News Service
Palestine - Solidarité
Panier de Crabes
Paper Blog fr
Paperless Korea
Paraguay Tistory
Partage dialoguer avec jean loup
Parti de Gauche 34
Partido Comunista Brasileiro
Patrice Mars
PCF Bassin
PCF Cap Corse
Peace by Truth
Peak Oil .pl
Pensare Liberi News
Pensioenblog
Perunica
Peter Pan's Paradijs
Philippe Vedovati
Pintxo
Planeta Caos
Planete Non Violence
Plein Overheid
Politics & Current Affairs
Portal Luis Nassif
Portland Independent Media Center
Post Jorion
Post Switch
Pragmatic Economist
Pravda / Правда
Primavera do 11
Project for the Old American Century
Prova Final
Puszta Igazság
Quo Fata Ferunt
Raise the Hammer
Ravage Digitaal
Rayven
Real Infos
Real Wealth Society
Recuperare Credit
Relapsing Fever
Resistance
ReRuBabs
Réseau International
Resistance 71
Résistance FR
Resistenze.org
Resistir Info
Resurs.by
Revolta Total Global
Robin Good
Rodon
Rol Club
Rue 89
Rus Nevod
Sahar TV Iran
Saura Plesio
Schoonoord Web
Seigneuriage Blogspot
Sempre Vigili!
Shem.se
Siddharth Varadarajan
Signoraggio.it
Silver and Gold Shop
Silver Bear Cafe
Sociale Databank Nederland
Sociale Driegeleding
Sociologias
SOS-crise
Sott.net
Soutenir l'Afghanistan
Spartacus.info
Spazio Forum
Spiegelbeeld
Spraakloos
Sprookje Nieuws
Stampa Libera
Star People
Stienster Blogspot
Studien von Zeitfragen
Stop de bankiers
Storyo.ru / Страницы истории
Suciologicus
Sustainocratie
Svobodnoslovo / Свободно слово
Tegen Onzin
Textos A Voz do Povo.pt
The Movement
The People's Forum
The Pragmatic Economist
The Voice of Wakker Holland
The Wild, Wild Left
Tijdgeest Magazine
Time For Change
Timotv
Toine van Bergen
TomskNet.ru / Город.Томск
To-p.biz
Top-débats.info
Tora Yeshua / תורה־ ישוע
Trademan.org
Transatlantic Information
Exchange System
Transition Town Breda
Transcom Se
Triplo II
Truth Spring
Truth Move 9/11
Tunisia Today
Uitpers
UKIP Hillingdon
Um Novo Despertar
Uruknet Info
Vemiplast
Verborgen Nieuws
Vermelho.org.br
Verontruste Moeders
Veterans for America
Video data bg
Viewzone Magazine
Vilag Helyzete Blogspot
Vilistia
Visionair.nl
Vision Démocrate.net
V-Kontakte.ru / Вконтакте
Voix dissonnantes
Volya.ariy.org
Voprosik / Вопросик
Voy Com
Vrijspreker
Vues du monde
Vyacheslav Burunov
ВячеславБурунов
Wake Up From Your Slumber
Wakkere Mensen
Wall Street Pit
Want to know .nl
War and Peace / война и мир
Waterput klassiek
We Are Change Holland
We Are Change Rennes
Welcome Back UZ
Werkgroep George Orwell
What really happened
Wij worden wakker
Wiki Strike
Wisdia Encyclopedia
Worldissue Blog bg
World Prout Assembly
Wroom.ru
YouTube
Yursodeistivie / Юрсодействие
ZakonVremeni.ru
ЗаконВремени
Zebuzzeo
Zé Povinho no século XXI
Znanie-Vlast.ru
БезФормата.ru

Since 2006 the sites here above have published one or more of the court fool's articles. Some seem to be out of reach today, either because these websites or pages do not exist anymore, or because of other causes. To compliment them, I have chosen to keep them in the list.
Rudo de Ruijter

courtfool-faviconSpecial thanks to:

Christine, Corinne, Francisco, Evelyne, Françoise, Gaël, Peter, Ingrid, Ivan, Krister, Jorge, Marie Carmen, Ruurd, Sabine, Lisa, Sarah, Valérie & Anonymous...

courtfool-faviconAcknowledgements for translations:

StartTranslators

Alter Info
Carlo Pappalardo
Come Don Chisciotte
Ermanno di Miceli
Ivan Boyadjhiev
Jorge G-F
Lisa Youlountas
Jose Joaquin
Manuel Valente Lopes
Marcella Barbarino
Marie Carmen
Mary Beaudoin
Michel Ickx
Михаил
Natalia Lavale
Nicoletta Forcheri
Peter George
Resistir Info
Traducteur sans frontière
Valérie Courteau

StartJoinTranslators

courtfool-faviconDo you want to translate too?

translator
Information stops at the linguistic borders. All translations on this site have been made by volunteers. If you speak more than one language, please consider translating an article too. Thank you in advance in the name of the thousands of people who will be able to read your translation.
Please contact:
Rudo de Ruijter
courtfool@xs4all.nl

Decrease text size
Increase text size

 

Facts and lies about the climate (3)

by Rudo de Ruijter,
Independent researcher,
With special thanks to climatologist Professor Patrick Tyson

part 3: CO2: scare, claims and fraud...

Global warming

The climate is changing, no doubt about it. The climate is always changing, often nearly imperceptibly, sometimes quickly. Today we experience a relatively quick change. We are told it is due to human activity. Since the start of the Industrial Revolution we have burnt always more coal, gas and oil from the underground, liberating their CO2 (carbondioxide) in the atmosphere. So, at first sight, it sounds logical to accuse the CO2 emissions of causing global warming.

These past years the United Nations have done a lot to create a world wide panic for CO2. However, more and more often we hear that CO2 cannot be the cause of global warming. What is false and what is true?

Preliminary study

As shown in "Facts and lies about the climate Part I" the clockwork of the Earth' changing orbit around the Sun and the tilt of its axis determine a part of the global warming. The variations in the Sun's activity and their effects on the processes in the Earth' atmosphere would be responsible for the rest of it. Among these processes the vaporization and condensation of H2O, in its forms of water vapour, liquid droplets and ice cristals play a very big role. The changes in water vapour levels have 25 times more impact on global warming than changes in CO2 levels.

CO2 study

The present article focuses on the CO2 aspects. My conclusion is that we have been deliberately deceived by the United Nations and that very probably, in the future, the fear for climate change will be used more often for political purposes as well as for profit making.

Help! The Sea level is rising!

That it is serious with the climate, is clear from the fear for the rising sea level that is put into us. The ice would melt. These last decades a lot of ice has melt near the North Pole. However, this is floating sea ice. It floats, because water expands when freezing. When it melts, it doesn’t take more room than the ice which is below the water. The melting of this ice won’t make the sea level rise, not even a single millimeter. It would be different, when ice caps on land, like on Greenland and Antarctica, would melt. Greenland is covered for 81% with an ice cap (1,755,637 km2) with an estimate volume of 2,620,000 km3. [68] If this melts, the sea level could rise by 6.5 meters. However, at some points this ice cap is over 3,000 m thick. If you know, that is has taken 18,000 years before all the ice of the last Ice Age had disappeared, you probably understand, that such a tick ice cap won’t melt in a few years time. [69] We surely do not need to start heightening our dikes. If that ice would start melting we still have generations of time for heightening them. It won’t cause a sudden tsunami. And if the land ice on Antarctica also starts melting, we don’t even need to higher the dikes and should better move, because at the South Pole there is enough ice to raise the water level by 65 meters.

CO2, what is claimed

The climate is changing. At least, we see a clear increasing tendency in temperatures near the surface, that started around 1885 and, after a few peaks and lows, was about one degree Celsius higher in 2000. On the other hand we know that the concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) has increased since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution from 0,027% to 0,036%. You read it well. We speak about thousandths of percents. The increase, however, is 40%.

CO2 is created by the combustion of organic materials, especially fossil fuel. This is what we have used a lot during the last century. So, when CO2 is accused to be the malefactor of global warming, that will sound acceptable to an outsider, the more as prominent politicians and, apparently, hordes of scientists shout the same thing.

Their argument is, that, by the increase of CO2, the blanket of greenhouse gases becomes thicker, causing the emission of heat into space to take place at a higher altitude, where it is colder, and where, thus, heat emission is less effective. Oof!

Heat budget and hypothesis

So it would be about a difference in incoming and outgoing radiation. That leads us directly to the preferred subject of many contemporary climatologists: the heat balance, also called energy budget. This is a kind of bookkeeping of the average incoming and outgoing heat in the atmosphere. The first was made by Dines in 1917. Until the satellite measures in 1977 it was unknown how much solar energy reached the top of the atmosphere. Nevertheless, generations of climatologists produced scientific reports with detailed numbers for different categories of incoming and outgoing radiation. From one scientist to another, the numbers could sometimes differ as much as 80 percent! [70] Since 1977 most of the climatologists work with approximately the same totals, which make their numbers look more in agreement with each other. However, it is important to stay aware, that all these detailed numbers on nice looking heat balance sheets are nothing more than estimates, based on suppositions, extrapolations and hypotheses at a particular point in time. This doesn’t mean they are worthless. It means, this is the best we dispose of for the moment. We can be sure for 99.9 percent, that by developments in science, these book keepings will look different in ten or twenty years. Here below, is a heat budget from Professor Patrick Tyson.

Heat inflow
Click to enlarge

Heat outflow
Click to enlarge

Some climatologists find these balances so appealing that at the same time they proclaim the theorem, that incoming and outgoing radiation are in equilibrium. Well, if that would be true, even for a split second, that would be pure coincidence. The processes that are responsible for warming are not the same as those for cooling. You need to be a very believing climatologist to assume that these processes form an equilibrium or that these processes would have a natural tendency to strive for equilibrium.

To render the accusations against CO2 more plausible, nice pictures and graphics are displayed. The following comes from a publication from the Australian Bureau Of Meteorology. It can also be found in several other publications.

Radiation absorption
click to enlarge

Figure 4. The radiation absorption characteristics of water vapour and carbon dioxide as a function of wavelength. The upper portion of the chart shows the wavelength distribution of radiation emitted from black bodies radiating at 6000K (approximately the solar photoshere) and 255K (approximately the earth's panetary temperature), with the solar irradiance measured at the mean distance of the earth from the sun. The percentage absorption of a vertical beam by representative atmospheric concentrations of water vapour (H2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) are shown in the lower panels.

Blackbody

In the upper part of this picture we see a graphic of a so called blackbody radiation. Imagine you have a black object that absorbs all radiation. You put it in a black box, where no radiation can enter, nor leave. Now, in that box you have a blackbody that turns out to emit a temperature dependent radiation spectrum, the so called blackbody radiation. Of course, you cannot make such a box in reality, because in that box you would need at least a hole to measure that radiation. It is a theoretical concept. At room temperature it emits infrared waves. At 700 degrees Celsius it emits red light and at 5727 degrees (6000 degrees Kelvin) it emits in the wavelengths of visible light. Then, when you apply the law of Max Planck (the founder of the Quantum theory) on that temperature, you get a nice graphic of blackbody radiation of the Sun, a symmetric curve, with a peak in the wavelengths of the visible light.

Subsequently, the idea is, that when you consider the Earth as a blackbody too, and adapt the formula a bit to take into account the albedo (the reflected radiation), then you can, with the lean measurements we dispose of, make a similar graphic of it.

From measurements it has been established, that the long wave radiation, that leaves the top of the atmosphere, totals 235 Watt per square meter. With a formula of Stephan Bolzmann, you can then calculate, that this is the radiation belonging to a blackbody of 251o Kelvin (-22o Celsius.) From another measurement it appears that the peak radiation of the Earth is very close to the 10 micrometer wavelength. According to the displacement formula of Wien, this belongs to a blackbody of 290o Kelvin (17o Celsius.)

These two results conflict. If we make a graphic of it, we get an asymmetrical curve, with on the left side a steep side, and on the right a less steep side. Next, the assumption is, that the difference between these two results must be imputed to the effect of the greenhouse gases.

The problem with this interesting application is that, in the first place, you must assume that the Earth functions as a blackbody and that incoming and outgoing radiation is equal. Of course, you could adapt the formulas to differences, but since we haven’t got the slightest idea how much these differences would be and because this uncertainty would make a mess of all the calculations, it is easier to pretend, that incoming and outgoing radiation are equal. However, this remains just a supposition, and cannot be proved yet. (Personally I don't believe it, already just by the observation that the Earth absorbs more radiation when it approaches the Sun. The océans form vast accumulators of heat.)

Further more, the albedo, the percentage of incoming radiation that is reflected, plays a big role in these calculations. This percentage is based on assumptions and extrapolations. Most scientists seem to consider albedos, close to 30 percent, as an acceptable percentage.

Finally, you have to accept the theorem, that the difference between 251 and 290o Kelvin must be entirely imputed to greenhouse gases, and that, for instance, cosmic radiation and the Earth’ own hot core plays a neglectible role.

Let’s go back to the picture of the Australian Bureau of Meteorology. The peak radiation of the Earth is displaced to 255o Kelvin, where most publications I found place the peak at 251o K. The peak is straight above a peak of the CO2 absorption in the lower part of the picture, what, undoubtedly, is meant to suggest a relation.

The lower two graphics show which wavelengths are absorbed by water vapour and CO2. What is not mentioned is that of both only the most common isotope is shown. The absorption spectra of water droplets and ice crystals are not shown. They have an absorption spectrum that is many times larger than that of water vapour. What can be seen is that water vapour absorbs many more wavelengths than does CO2 and overlaps it for the bigger part. What is not mentioned either is that there is more than 25 times more water vapour than CO2 in the atmosphere. A minor increase of just 4% in the quantity of water vapour has more effect, than a 100% increase in CO2!

Scientists do no agree with each other about the role of CO2. What is generally admitted is that the shape of the CO2 -molecule is not very suited for the absorption of sun beams. In the wavelengths up to 3 micron CO2 only has a tiny absorption around 1.9 micron and one around 2.7 micron. The most important absorption lines of CO2 are around 15 micron, so, in the infrared. Now some scientists argue that CO2 has already reached its saturation level by far. Experiences in laboratories would prove that CO2 reaches its maximal absorption within 10 meters. Then, a doubling of the percentage of CO2 would just mean that CO2 is saturated within 5 meters. [71] Others argue that CO2 in the atmosphere cannot be compared with it, and that it hasn’t reached its saturation yet. According to them, an increase in CO2 would still contribute to global warming, although it is minimal and certainly not proportional to the percentage of CO2 increase.

The statement, that more CO2 would make the blanket of greenhouse gases so much thicker, that by the increased altitude the emission of heat into space is hindered by colder temperatures, is, in my opinion, pure nonsense. CO2 represents only 0.038% of the atmosphere. That means that a 40% CO2-increase would make the total blanket 3.30 m thicker. Compare this with H2O, that, with its phase changes between water droplets and water vapour, can make the blanket 400 m thicker when water vaporizes and makes it shrink again when vapour condensates. When there are cumulo-nimbus clouds, water vapour can even raise many kilometers. If there is something like a blanket of greenhouse gases, than it is a blanket with a turbulent upper side, where H2O, with its expansions from vaporizations and contractions from condensations, creates peaks and pits, with extended possibilities for heat emission to space at many different altitudes and at many different temperatures.

I think it is questionable, that CO2 would be a significant factor in global warming. During the past millions of years the level of CO2 was generally much higher. [72] For the past 420,000 years we dispose of an ice core from a super deep drilling in Vostok, in Antarctica, completed in 1996. With theoretical models, that are still discussed, graphics have been made, that would show a correlation between temperature and CO2. It is a bit difficult to extract details from this graphics, as the thickness of one little line represents already 1,000 years. From this graphics, you cannot deduct, that a raise in CO2 causes a raise in temperature, like Al Gore pretends. (I have not been able to find a single report of collaborators of the Vostok-project that mentions this causal relation.) [73] On the contrary, studies by Veizer (University of Ottawa) and others show that there is no correlation between global temperatures and atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations over the entire geologic record (long term). Intermediate term results from ice cores show that in every case carbon dioxide concentrations followed temperature changes, and therefore could not cause them. 

Finally we may ask ourselves, to which degree ice cores from Antarctica are representative for the whole world. On Antarctica, there are no trees, and exactly trees absorb CO2. More CO2 could also simply lead to faster growth of plants and trees, if, at least, we offer them enough space. Today we are still busy to cut the remaining tropical forests at the speed of an express train and about everywhere in the world we cut back forests to make room for cities and agricultural land.

The hockey stick fraud

According to a graphic in the 2001-report of the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), today’s temperatures would be the highest of the last 1000 years, due to a sharp increase with 1o C. in the last 150 years. The graph appeared six times in the report and was reiterated in the 2007 report. It is the dramatic ilustration of today’s global warming.

The hockeystick fraude
Click to enlarge

This graphic has become known as the hockey stick. It is fraudulent for two reasons. First, because tree rings have been used as the principal proxy for temperature. At the time it was already well known, that tree rings do not only vary with temperature, but also with CO2 and thus cannot be used as proxy for temperature. IPCC knew this very well too. They had published a warning against the use of tree rings in their report of 1990. The fabricators of the hockey stick gave the tree rings 400 times more weight than the other proxies they used.

little ice age

But to get their dramatic effect of the highest temperatures in 1000 years, they had to get rid of the mediaeval warm period, that was much warmer than today, as shown in the IPCC report of 1990.

The second fraud consisted in replacing the real data of the warm period with fabricated colder estimates. It is thanks to the tenacity of the Canadian statistician Steve McIntyre and his colleague professor Ross McKitrick that the corruption was finally exposed. On the computer of the fabricators of the hockey stick, they found the real temperatures in a file labeled “censored data”. [74]

Al Gore too, used the hockey stick graphics in the slide shows he presented all over the world to promote the CO2 scare. In an “Inconvenient truth”, again, he presents today’s warming as exceptional. [75] In 2007, he received a Nobel Price for his CO2 campaign, together with the U.N.’ IPCC. [76]

In fact, warm periods, like today’s and that of the Middle Ages, have nothing exceptional. Even if you rather believe Al Gore, but take a look at the last 5,000 years period, you will find more of such warm periods. [77]

Maybe the most remarkable aspect would be the rather quick rise of one degree in 150 years. The study of Earth’ orbits does not deliver anything that could explain this quick rise. (See part 1.) This quick rise wasn’t even continual. According to the ice core studies by Veizer (University of Ottawa) and others, global temperatures dropped between 1940 and 1980. By the way, this was a period of the most intense increase in global CO2 concentrations. 

Could increased solar activity be the explanation then? Scaffeta and West (Duke University) think so and estimate that as much as 35% of the recent (post 1980) warming and as much as 50% of the earlier (1900 to 1980) warming can be attributed to it. According to Solanki, et al (in the October 2004 issue of Nature), since 1930 the solar emissivity has been at the highest levels in more than 8,000 years. However, if there were a direct correlation between solar activity and temperature, the latter would not have dropped between 1940 and 1980, wouldn’t it?

I think it is safe to conclude, that the raise in global temperatures of the last 150 years cannot be attributed to CO2, nor just to increased  solar activity. On the other hand, an increase of H2O in the atmosphere would have 25 times more effect then CO2, but it seems this has not been investigated on a global scale. Other, not yet investigated factors, may well shed more light on the question in the future.

What surprises me, is that none of the studies I have seen, pays much attention to the changes in the use of the Earth’ surface. Forests have made way for fields and meadows, often extensively drained, irrigated and sprinkled. Men do not always do so with sufficient knowledge and insight, testified by the disappearance of Lake Aral (not so long ago a landlocked sea) [78], and the drying up of dozens of rivers, among which the Murray river in Australia. [79]

Big surfaces of agricultural land often let winds dry out the surface and pick up dust. Excessive water extractions for consumption, agriculture, industries and around mining sites dry out the surface too. Such dry areas easily become much hotter in summer. Hot spots tend to create their own local climate, with thermiques and turbulences in the air above.

Cities and their industries not only produce heat, but also emissions of vapour, steam and particles, adding to the greenhouse effect.

Compare this with what has disappeared most: forests. Forests are important for withholding water, for keeping drying winds away from the surface, for the prevention of erosion and desert forming, for reducing daily differences in temperatures, for taking up energy in photosynthesis while producing oxygen, which, by the way, is not a greenhouse gas.

With this conclusion I could end my study about the climate. But then, probably, I would leave unanswered the most important question: Why information is spread all over the world, that must make us believe, that it is all about CO2?

What goes behind the CO2 scam?

This question was not the subject of my climate research. But maybe we find that answer, when we ask ourselves, why, of all plausible causes and of all greenhouse gases, CO2 has been chosen. Why isn’t there a world wide propaganda against dust and other tiny particles that contribute to global warming? Why isn’t it the greenhouse gases, expelled by the industries, like hydrofluorocarbon, perfluorocarbon and sulfur-hexafluoride, [80] that are accused? These are, indeed, the greenhouse gases, that did not exist before the industrial era.

Who profits?

The scam has been organized on a world wide level, with the United Nations as instigator and Al Gore as messenger. The clear intention was to fool governments, policymakers, industrials as well as eco-activists. So there must be very high interests involved. For all deceptions goes that there must be a motive behind it. Most often it is profit. So a logical question would then be "who profits of the CO2-scare?"

Car industries?

Although it seems questionable to me that the car industries have enough influence in the United Nations to make them organize such a swindle, they clearly profit a lot from the CO2 scare. They have developed cars that are more efficient, use less petrol and emit less CO2. They have organized a successful marketing campaign to present these cars as "eco-cars", "green cars" and "environmentally friendly" cars. Governments are (or have been) subsidising the purchase of these cars with tax reductions. There are city centres in Germany, where you are not allowed to drive without an official sticker that your car has low CO2-emissions. Germany is the country of the big Mercedes and Audi, so, of course,  they have taken care to choose their calculation methods in a way that these big cars can still circulate in these city centres, while some older smaller cars don't get a green sticker even if they emit less CO2 .

The scam is not that much in the unfair calculation method, as in the fact, that these modern cars are not environmentally friendly at all. They pollute heavily! In Europe we have emission levels of particles that diesel engines are not allowed to exceed. However, these levels only apply to diesel engines. In the past they were considered to be the dirty polluters. If we compare the emission of particles of today's green cars with the limit set for diesel engines, our modern subventioned green cars exceed these limits by many times! [81]

Vervuiling benzine versus diesel
click to enlarge

Next to these so called "eco-cars", the car industries have developed hybride petrol/electric cars and they are also developing the all-electric cars with zero CO2-emission. Of course, the global warming scare has made these cars highly popular, at least in the press. For at this moment there are nearly no all-electrics on the roads yet. Mass production is about ready to start, but tests are still running to find the most practical way to fill the batteries or to exchange them underway.

 

Well, here too big scams are going on. In the first place, when they say CO2-emissions are nil, they don't count the emissions at the production of electricity. Neither do they count the emissions for the construction and maintenance of a distribution network. You could plug some cars in the existing network, but if a majority of cars would become electric, we need many more power plants and an enormous extension of the capacity of the distribution network. And how environmentally friendly is the production and the disposal of batteries and solar panels today?

 

The other scam, much bigger, is making people believe that there are enough environmentally friendly sources to produce all the electricity for our cars. At this moment, of all energy we use in the world, about 1% comes from sustainable sources, like solar, wind and hydro-energy. The latter can hardly expand, because most interesting spots to build dams are already in use. Wind and Sun energy are fluctuating much too much to guarantee a continual supply. If we still want to use them, we will need enormous stocks of exchangeable batteries to let us drive during the dark winter days. I haven't calculated how much surface of solar panels we would need to fill enough batteries for the year round, but I am afraid these giant surfaces will be impossible to find. Some people suggest in the deserts, but for Europe the closest desert is the Sahara and we haven't found a way to transport the electricity. Classical powerlines have much too much resistance. Besides, if somewhere you create really giant parks of solar panels and draw the energy away from that region in the form of electricity, you create a local climate change. Heavy sand storms are likely to occur.

 

The obvious conclusion is that once we are addicted to electricity for our mobility, our politicians and our  electricity producers will simply say we have to accept nuclear energy. Of course, they will ensure us that it is safe, like they have always done.

 

Nuclear energy lobby?

The nuclear energy lobby brings us, indeed, to the United Nations Plaza in New York. Here we find:

Why do I think the IAEA and the SC's permanent members may have something to do with the campaign to create a world wide Global Warming panic? The reason is simple. If they can make the world believe that CO2 is the problem, they have the solution. They have what they call "clean nuclear electricity", guaranteed without CO2 emission.

The nuclear weapon states have developed a smart project and they are executing it step by step. Maybe you have never heard about it yet, because not many journalists pay attention. Their plan is called the Multilateral Nuclear Approach (MNA). In this plan the nuclear weapon states become the exclusive suppliers of enriched uranium for all the nuclear power plants in the other 183 NPT-countries. These other countries would not have the right anymore to enrich uranium themselves. They would depend entirely on deliveries by the nuclear weapon states from stocks held outside the customers' countries. The first of these stocks is already in place in Russia. The nuclear fuel suppliers act under the umbrella of the IAEA, which drew the plan.

This plan will make all countries totally dependent upon the nuclear weapon states, which can simply stop delivering nuclear fuel to force the countries into immediate submission. It is a new world order that is taking shape.

The only thing that is still lacking for the success of their project is a pretext to repeal article 4 of the Non Proliferation Treaty, which says that each member has the right to enrich uranium for its civil needs. They have tried very hard to use Iran's nuclear energy program to show how dangerous enrichment would be. In spite of years of false accusations by the US, UK and France, that attempt has failed. The CO2 scam has been fabricated rather in the same period. If it was intended to help the MNA-project into the saddle, it has failed too. Too many people know about the fraud now.

Nevertheless the participants have been honoured. In 2005 IAEA's director El Baradei received a Nobel Prize for his contribution and in 2007 Al Gore together with the fraudulent IPCC have received one for theirs.

For more details on the Multilateral Nuclear Approach, you can read "Raid on the nuclear fuel market" [83]

My climate conclusions

We are 20,000 years underway in a 50,000 year warming period of a Milankovitch cycle. Within these cycles the Sun's emissivity varies a lot, with eras of high and low activity. Much of what circulates as climate science today is based on hypotheses, that may or may not be confirmed by further research in the future. The CO2-story is fraudulent. The different isotopes of H2O have a much larger absorption spectrum and besides there is 25 times as much of it in the atmosphere.

We should be aware, that political and commercial interests hinder objective science. Scientists who don't conform to UN's corrupt campaign don't get the attention they should receive, like for instance Henrik Svensmark, who has found correlations between the Sun's magnetism and temperatures. [84]

The political and commercial interests at stake are that high that we may expect more climate deceptions in the future. If you don't like to be fooled, have a look at:

part 1: The clockwork of the Earth and Sun

part 2: The activity of the Sun

 

Sources & references:

[68] https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/ the-world-factbook/geos/gl.html

[69] http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/ environment/waterworld.html

[70] http://www.atmo.arizona.edu/ students/courselinks/spring04/atmo451b/ pdf/RadiationBudget.pdf

[71] http://www.nov55.com/ntyg.html

[72] http://earthguide.ucsd.edu/ virtualmuseum/images/ CO2History.html  

[73] http://www.nature.com/ nature/journal/v399/n6735/ full/399429a0.html glaciog.ujf-grenoble.fr

[74] http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/ stories/papers/monckton/ monckton_what_hockey_stick.pdf

[75] http://climateaudit.org/2007/11/09/ al-gore-and-dr-thompsons-thermometer/ 

[76] http://www.msnbc.msn.com/ id/21262661/ 

[77] http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/ File:Holocene_Temperature_Variations.png

[78] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ 2010/04/04/ aral-sea-almost-dried-up_n_524697.html

[79] http://www.guardian.co.uk/ commentisfree/2009/apr/17/ australia-murray-river-water

[80] http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/ energyexplained/index.cfm? page=environment_about_ghg

[81] http://www.duh.de/pressemitteilung.html?& tx_ttnews[tt_news]=2647

[82] www.unep.org/gc/gc26/docs/ K1171827-GC-26-INF24- List_of_participants.pdf

[83] http://www.courtfool.info/ nl_Overval_op_nucleaire_brandstofmarkt.htm

[84] http://www.dsri.dk/~hsv/

 

[*] With special thanks to climatologist Professor Patrick Tyson, who has taken the time to explain all the key issues to me.

This study contains 3 parts:

part 1: The clockwork of the Earth and Sun

part 2: The activity of the Sun

part 3: CO2 scare, claims and fraud...

May 2012

For reactions you can contact the author via courtfool@xs4all.nl

If you wish, you may copy and forward this article or publish it in newspapers and on websites.

 

If you don't want to miss the next publication, then click here:

flag UK   I would like to receive an email as soon as another article appears in English.
If the link doesn't work, please send an email.
address: courtfool@xs4all.nl
subject: Subscribe articles EN